Changes

From Australian sf information
Jump to: navigation, search

Talk:2012 Ditmar eligibility list

459 bytes added, 04:28, 15 March 2012
changing subheader; replying re. Aknyra
: OK, I'm not sure that simply removing all that valuable information (which at least pointed people towards work they might want to consider) is the way to go. I mean, ideally you'd list each and every review individually, but that seems way too much work. Maybe it's worth adding a subsection within the Atheling listing which points out people who have produced Atheling-eligible work (and where it can be found), without specifying that work. — [[User:Jeremygbyrne|JEREMY]] 20:09, 20 August 2011 (CDT)
====EligibilityAdding my own work to the eligibility list==== 
Is it frowned upon to add your own work to the Ditmar eligibility list? [[User:Aknyra|Aknyra]] 23:04, 14 March 2012 (CDT)
: By no means. (Some people would tell you to nominate, vote and publicly solicit nominations and votes for yourself too, although that's certainly a greyer area--rah-rah blogging and tweeting seems to be OK; "How to Vote for Me" instructions tend to lead to viral frowning-upon.) Please, go ahead. And thanks for asking; I've edited your header to make it easier for other people to find this answer. 23:28, 14 March 2012 (CDT)
approved, Bureaucrats, natconcom, Administrators
787
edits

Navigation menu